A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
降低预期之后，它就是一部中规中矩不出错，剧情朴实无华看得懂的电影。但放在漫威里就显得格格不入，远不及可侃侃而谈之作。
比剧情和设定的bug，色调太黑才是最大的问题，最后的兄弟大战黑的一塌糊涂，打了个寂寞啊，这要在电影院能有啥观影体验，蝙蝠侠虽然也黑但没你这么乱啊。
醇所致急性胃损伤
行吧，漫威作为一个品牌，已经发展出自己的超能力了。超级催眠。
整部片子就突出一个无聊……好莱坞的编剧问题已经大到演员特效IP什么都救不了了
至少比《毒液》之流的好看
话说，正反派打斗时那种“幻影”的感觉不错。
耶稣变成吸血鬼，嘻嘻。只爱搞设定而忽视情感线会崩的一塌涂地，而且设定很老套：顺风耳，爷会飞，与动物沟通。仿佛几百年前的泰山也可以啊。科技感也没有，有点土味视频的感觉了。
当少爷精致的面容一次次被损害，我？？？老子不能忍，低分伺候。而小11实在太惨了！就算没了特效还像糊着一层特效。星星都给前1小时的剧情还可以，后面老套而没有升华。
又是像毒液2一样浪费时间的片子 索尼这样搞下去迟早要完蛋
纯纯无脑爆米花电影，所有角色几乎没有什么情感铺垫。还有经典俗烂剧情：主角兄弟获得能力后就会变坏...
1.男主的大油头，还整个面条发型，晃来晃去的，还以为是基努里维斯；2.男主的善念、反派的恶念都没有做太好的铺垫，推进比较乱；3.这是真正的蝙蝠侠了，还要和蜘蛛侠、毒液联动。2022.6.9
看得一边困得想吐，一边问这段是想表达什么。超英都能拍得这么无聊。
这也太无趣了，烟质特效和子弹时间完全没有惊喜，故事稀里糊涂的
反派这感觉天生是坏种吧。主角也够呛。投资各种支持你要啥我给啥，你把自己治好了，变身韦蝠王了，人家想一起就不行了，解药都搞出来了你既然不愿意身负这种诅咒怎么不给自己来一针。。真是一万个无语。浪费了莱托少爷的脸。服化道以及特效。编剧太水。过家家谁当爸爸谁当妈妈还的有个理由呢
電影沒有想象中的爛，就是正常爆米花片水準，不過變身后角色是真丑，希望下一部可以換造型變成尊貴吸血鬼博士。
杰瑞德·莱托在DC《自杀小队》表现不佳后，又在漫威这边接了一个失败的项目，可能他选超级英雄片的眼光需要提高一下。本片基本就是莱托的独角戏，不过好在是莱托，外形非常符合莫比亚斯的吸血鬼设定，才让这部乏味的电影有了一丝可看性。不得不说，两个彩蛋加一起也许都比正片好看。作为超级英雄片，最重要的就是把英雄的能力与剧情结合，可是本片如果把莫比亚斯换成浩克或毒液，都完全不影响整体效果与剧情，无非是科学家研制超级血清给自己使用，却又被不法分子利用的故事。整个故事莫比亚斯没有人物弧度，前半部并没有看出其良善本心，一切都以“本来就是罪人”作为其行为正当性。大反派的威胁近在眼前，居然还去捣毁小喽啰的假钞窝点，只是为了给自己搞一个后面没什么用处的实验室。总之一切就是为了最后秃鹫集结反派联盟而起。
介乎于青翼蝠王韦一笑与百特曼之间的男人，期待三个人打一场，另外，卡西欧出了多少钱赞助？
5.5分。仿佛回到漫威20年前的杂牌英雄电影水平。
2.0。1.兄弟对立能理解，但是反派转变太快毫无征兆。2.特效、服化道、场面都乏善可陈。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
